If anyone had any doubts as to whether online fundraising platforms are positively supporting fundraising efforts, two key announcements this week must have blown them away.
Bmycharity announced that it had seen a 47% growth in online giving since this time last year coupled with an 8% increase in average donation value (from £36.17 to £38.90). Whilst Justgiving announced that its average donation declined by 8% from £32 to £29.50, fundraisers for the London Marathon alone had raised more than £22 million using the site, which is incredible. Collectively, these services are doing a great job in supporting the fundraising efforts of the ever adventurous and always generous British public.
But the launch of Virgin Money Giving in recent weeks and its official tie-in with the London Marathon from next year has potentially given Bmycharity and Justgiving charity clients another option to consider (aside from the fact that their website collapsed last week).
So which should we choose? Given that charities have to pay some form of nominal charge to register for these services and then a transaction-based fee to enable fundraisers to support them online, understanding the various pricing models is key to choosing the right service for any charity. I tried to draw up a comparison table for inclusion with this article but after much crossing out and calculator work, I only managed to draw two conclusions instead:
- The best priced deal will depend on how many transactions the charity thinks will be generated, over what time period and how much support they will need from the provider. The transaction fees differ across providers and, when coupled with the variable set-up charges, monthly contract options, volume discounts and additional service charges (such as debit card fees), it became clear that one size does not fit all.
- All three (proven in Bmycharity and Justgiving’s case) can do the basics; collect donations, manage the gift aid calculations, provide basic reporting on campaign progress and enable fundraisers to create their own web pages to attract donors
Which is the cheapest basic service will be a maths exercise depending on each charity’s own circumstances. There are of course other factors beyond the pricing model to consider as cost effectiveness and positive impact are not the same as ‘cheapest’.
As a communications specialist, anything which gives me the opportunity to provide a relevant, positive and timely platform to engage with fundraisers and potential supporters appeals very strongly. Justgiving enables individual fundraisers to tell their stories on personalised pages and to incorporate a few paragraphs about the charity they support. They also offer charities a static information page to explain a little about what they do.
Whilst there are thousands of charities registered (useful if you are looking for inspiration), I couldn’t find any which really used their few paragraphs to try and encourage people to support them more broadly. Lots of information but not so much engagement.
Bmycharity positions itself slightly differently in that it claims to provide charity clients with the wherewithal to do just that. On reviewing a few examples, I can see how some of their more thoughtful charity clients are using this extra service to good effect. For example, breast cancer charity Walk the Walk uses its pages to encourage donations, inform visitors of future events, showcase videos of events, link to twitter communications and, overall, tries to create a sense of community for supporters by inviting them to ‘join in’ at various points.
Children’s medical research charity Sparks goes a step further and offers alternative fundraising ideas such as inviting visitors to use the charity service on ebay in support of the cause and giving its corporate partner promotional space – mutual benefit.
Still others seek to recruit volunteers and to take the opportunity to show what a difference people’s donations will actually make to the charity’s beneficiaries.
We don’t yet know what Virgin Money Giving’s offering will look like in the flesh but I doubt it will be long before charities start to use the service and we will have some real world examples to consider.
It’s not my place to make a recommendation as to which service charities should use but I have noted a couple of things when reviewing what’s on offer. Firstly, charities do need to think about integrating their communications opportunities with fundraisers and use each platform at their disposal to the maximum effect. This means using the tools available to grow support and blowing our own trumpets more broadly than simply offering fundraisers an online collection service.
Lastly, I’m not even sure charities should be choosing a single provider. Take the much (digitally) publicised case of Amanda Wilkie - @MandyPandy32 to her twitter friends. Amanda has successfully networked across twitter to both raise the profile of Walk the Walk (her page on Bmycharity has attracted more than 22,000 visitors, generating significant positive awareness for the charity), and to overtly ask for sponsorship. Amanda uses both Bmycharity and Justgiving to maximise her chances of raising donations. Consequently, this means Walk the Walk needs a presence on both services to maximise the benefits.
Thoughts welcome as ever.
Comments
Guy makes a really interesting point regarding closing the feedback loop and thanking donors for their support.
Bryan Miller's latest blog on See the Difference suggests that they may have some of the answers - at least in video form.
Kevin Baughen is the founder of Bottom Line Ideas (www.bottomlineideas.com) and a volunteer speaker for Cancer Research UK
Kevin Baughen is the founder of Bottom Line Ideas (www.bottomlineideas.com), a charity Trustee and a volunteer speaker for Make A Wish Foundation UK
Jonathan, thanks for your thoughts. Looking at the various players and how much detail there is to review, I couldn't have done any more in less than 1000 words!
You are absolutely right that I was bound to scratch the surface and, being the comms person I am, focused on those services of most interest to someone like myself.
Thanks for adding more detail which I am sure brings a broader perspective to the discussion - much appreciated.
Kevin Baughen is the founder of Bottom Line Ideas (www.bottomlineideas.com) and a volunteer speaker for Cancer Research UK
Kevin Baughen is the founder of Bottom Line Ideas (www.bottomlineideas.com), a charity Trustee and a volunteer speaker for Make A Wish Foundation UK
Hi Kevin
Thanks for this survey of the services available. You've highlighted one of the key differences - that we (uniquely) provide our client charities with the opportunity to communicate, recruit and develop individual and corporate relationships through their sponsorship pages, through a real-time content management service.
I should explain why we do this. We believe that a sponsorship page is a fantastic opportunity for a charity to communicate and engage, as well as collect donations. By helping our charity partners to engage we lower their cost of supporter recruitment and we also boost their average donation values and conversion rates.
We don't provide a Facebook application since this removes the opportunity for the charity to get these messages across (it's very easy to link direct to a Bmycharity page from Facebook - thousands of our users do this).
The numbers speak for themselves - our donation averages are higher than Justgiving's and the gap is growing.
We don't currently offer Paypal because the charges are higher than for alternative cards, and if you compare the fundraising performance of Amanda Wilkie's Bmycharity and Justgiving pages you will see that (at present) she has raised more than 40 times as much through Bmycharity (for her story check http://bmy.typepad.com).
Choice is healthy in any market and Virgin Money's approach indicates the value that their marketeers associate with fundraising pages. For those charities that want to use this opportunity to build relationships with supporters rather than appear as just another charity asking for money, or as a marketing conduit for Virgin Money, we exist to provide an alternative.
An interesting article. We use both online providers as we feel that choice is important.
Both options have strengths and weaknesses: reach, branding, customisation, back end reporting, gift aid reporting etc. It is fairly obvious: one party has a fundraiser focus the other a charity focus. Example: above, Johnathan addresses the points missing in yiur article about their fundraiser options not charity ones, though I believe this is coming. As a result I tailor our approach to each based on their strengths.
Cost differences between the 2 are smoke and mirrors (though their websites would like to disagree)...much depends on the size of the total amount of donations an organisation is putting through the varying parties. Paypal is an interesting one and prior to @Mandypandy we have never been asked for it...
One thing not mentioned by the article is the opportunity that online donation systems can miss out on is the charity thanking properly the actual donor. Neither party provides a proper in-house solution to this - the text available to thank donors specifically is paltry; the onus is put back on the charity to do it through their own systems by way of providing a data file of only those that want to be contacted again by the charity...which means it doesn't always get done and the thanking is then limited. This is one of the single biggest opportunities that charities who use online systems should really try to get around.
@Mandypandy has done an incredible job at raising awareness of the charity and raising a heap of money. But Twitter is only part of the options available to fundrasiers (if they 'get' it) and charities but in our experience it works better for our fundraisers than us. On the flip side Facebook and our own recently launched forum provide a better vehicle at communicating our message to the thousands of walkers taking part in our events and helping them directly with fundraising ideas.
Will be interesting to see what happens with Virgin Giving...
Guy Aubertin
Commercial Director
Walk the Walk
Kevin, thanks for making the comparison, but I don't feel like you've really delved into the differences between the services.
You mention how Justgiving enables people to create their own page, get their own message out on our site, but with content and internet visits more distributed nowadays, you've neglected to mention how Justgiving is the only service to offer widgets people can put on their blogs/sites and a Facebook application that has been used by over 300,000 people to raise money.
Connecting with the social web and people's distributed online presences is vital these days, and giving the estimated 9 million UK users of Facebook an easy way to fundraise is something only we provide.
PS, the reason Mandy also used Justgiving is that it gave her sponsors another way to donate (via PayPal) - http://twitter.com/MandyPandy32/status/1603637862 - this is something we added to our site in January after listening to our users, and is not a feature offered anywhere else. Because we are a profit making business, we can put those profits back into the site to make it easier to use and enable people to raise more through providing new services. And with 10% of all donations on Justgiving now being made through PayPal since its introduction, I can't help feeling that fundraisers are missing out on donations by other services not offering it as a form of payment.
Jonathan Waddingham
Charity champion
Justgiving
dd 020 7067 0923
email jonathan@justgiving.com
6-7 St Cross St, London, EC1N 8UA
http://justgiving.wordpress.com
Jonathan Waddingham
Digital Strategist
Justgiving
dd 020 7067 0923
email jonathan@justgiving.com
30 Eastbourne Terrace, London, W2 6LA
http://blog.justgiving.com
Thanks Kevin. That is a very good overview, and I've seen it mentioned in a few posts on Twitter already.
I'll just be fair to Virgin Money Giving and point out that it wasn't their site that went down on Monday (they don't formally go live until this summer) but the site of the Virgin London Marathon which opened up (briefly!) to registrations from would-be runners.
Howard Lake @howardlake www.fundraising.co.uk