Sounds counter-intuitive doesn't it? Surely our selfless motivations, if we really believe that "we are all in it together" should prompt us to ask "where can I help?".
But we're not all altruistic to the point of self-sacrifice because increasingly we can't afford to be. Perhaps the most realistic expectation is to ask "what's in it for us?" where "us" means our nearest and dearest as well as our broader community and associations.
Why am I talking about this philosophical stuff, you may ask...? Because if we as organisations want anything from other individuals or organisations, I believe we need to understand the distinction between the above positions very clearly. There is a tried and tested marketing concept called the value equation which suggests that in order to elicit the action we want from target audiences, we have to offer something commensurateand meaningful to them in order for them to perceive value in doing it.